The Making of Women’s Equality Day

Today’s post was written by Christine Blackerby, Education and Public Outreach Specialist in the Center for Legislative Archives.

Wisonsin Ratification of the 19th Admendment, June 11, 1919 (page 1 of 3)

Wisconsin Ratification of the 19th Amendment, June 11, 1919 (pg 1 of 3)

Today is Women’s Equality Day, which marks the date in 1920 when the 19th Amendment providing for women’s suffrage was declared to be ratified and therefore part of the U.S. Constitution. The drive for women’s voting rights had started in 1848 in Seneca Falls, New York. By the time the amendment was certified on August 26, 1920, it had taken 72 years to realize the goal.

However, many women saw suffrage as just one step for women’s rights. There was much more to be done to ensure that women would be equal to men. Three years later, in 1923, the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was introduced in Congress for the first time. Congressman Daniel Anthony, Susan B. Anthony’s nephew, submitted the joint resolution in the House of Representatives, starting a debate that continues to this day. Introduced in Congress more times than any other amendment, the Equal Rights Amendment would have provided for legal gender equality if it had been ratified by the states.

Anthony’s amendment failed, as did over 1,100 more attempts. The issue continued to gain support though, and in the 1970s Congress held hearings on the Equal Rights Amendment. Many citizens wrote to Congress to express their support or opposition. One supporter was Liz Carpenter, who warned, “Don’t be fooled by the bugaboos raised by the Amendment’s opponents. Women will gladly trade protective laws for some equal pay and equal rights.” But Congress also heard from women like Mrs. Thomas Zeko, who said, “The mal-contents, lesbians and Communists of women’s lib main purpose seems to be to downgrade the marvelous vocation of mother-homemaker.”

Photograph of Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) Posters on the Back of a Station Wagon, NARA ID 7452296

Photograph of Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) Posters on the Back of a Station Wagon, NARA ID 7452296

The ERA passed Congress in 1972 by a two-thirds vote, as required by Article V of the Constitution. However, amendments must also be ratified by three quarters of the states, and the ERA was just three states short of the 38 ratifications needed. As the seven-year time limit for ratification approached in 1979, Congress and President Jimmy Carter controversially extended the deadline three years. However, no additional states ratified. In 1982, the amendment failed.

The National Archives Museum exhibit “Amending America” features these documents and many other stories about constitutional amendments. All of the documents from the exhibit are available in NARA’s online Catalog as well as in an eBook available as a free download in the iTunes store.

The 1,100 proposals for the ERA are part of the list of more than 11,000 constitutional amendments that have been introduced in Congress. As part of the “Amending America” initiative, the National Archives digitized the list of amendments, and made it available for free download on Data.gov.

National Archives Women's Affinity Group logoWe’ll soon be adding new channels for sharing these stories online. The National Archives Women’s Affinity Group (WAG) will introduce  a new Twitter account and Tumblr blog to explore  the history of American women  and promote the documents which tell their stories. Follow @USNatArchives on Twitter and US National Archives on Facebook for information on the launch.  

 

This entry was posted in Education, Online Research, Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Making of Women’s Equality Day

  1. Nick says:

    Couldn’t help but wonder why the quote from Mrs. Thomas Zeko was chosen given the many anti-ERA letters that were received … Was it truly representative of the gist of the arguments made by that side OR was it chosen to make those who raised objections to the amendment look as ridiculous as possible?

    To me this would be analogous to doing an article on Vietnam War protests and choosing as the sole representative of the anti-war side someone who was openly pro-Vietcong.

    Like

    • usnationalarchives says:

      There were many cultural, social, and economic facets to the arguments made by both the pro- and anti-ERA advocates, and those perspectives are reflected in NARA’s holdings. The quote from Mrs. Thomas Zeko is representative of the arguments that advocated for maintaining traditional cultural roles for women.

      To help preserve the documents, the items on display in the Amending America gallery are regularly rotated. This also allows us to show different facets of the arguments. As such, the letter from Mrs. Thomas Zeko has been replaced with a flyer from women’s organizations who argued against ERA to preserve protections for women in the workplace. -Christine

      Like

  2. jacob james says:

    ‘Women’s Equality Day’ dates back to 1920 which was a significant year for women. The year highlighted the importance of equality between women and men. We should be identified as human beings and should fall in the category of mankind. The blog describes the journey of women from 1920 to today in a right manner. It has definitely stuffed the shelves of our minds with the information about how women got the equality rights in different countries.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s