7 thoughts on “Have Your Say: Open Government at the Archives!

  1. Hi Ella,

    Thanks for your comment! We are a contributing institution for the Digital Public Library of America and you can see the records we have contributed here.

    We expect to describe these efforts in our next Open Government Plan, but please let us know if you have any ideas for what you’d like to see us doing in this space.


  2. Please release all John Kennedy related files including all those of George Joannides. Please not allow ANY more time to past before you release the files. Thanks

  3. The US National Archives has previewed an impressive overview of its 2014-2016 Open Government Plan. Even better, it has vigorously welcomed public comment. It’s three flagship initiatives look to be especially transformative. Kudos to the Archive for embracing the power of technology, open source, and crowd-sourcing to share its jewels with the widest possible audience.

    From the perspective of the National Security Archive, however, the Action Plan does have one glaring omission: a lack of attention to promoting expedient and efficient declassification and access to declassified documents.

    A recent survey by the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations shows further widespread desire for more of a NARA-led focus on promoting efficient and credible declassification. Seventy percent of 784 researchers surveyed described the importance of declassified documents to historical research as “very important and indispensable,” another fourteen percent described declassified documents as “important and necessary.” Twenty eight percent of the respondents described the availability of declassified documents at NARA as “very worrisome” or “disappointing.”

    One inclusion into the Action Plan that would have an immediate impact on the declassification process would be a formal adoption of the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s and DNI General Counsel Bob Litt’s instruction to declassify historic documents even when they may be technically “properly classified.”

    During a March 2014 Sunshine Week speech, Litt stated that those with classification and declassification authority must ask themselves “not can we classify, but should we?” Litt pointed to Section 3.1 (d) of the Executive Order on Classification 13526, and claimed that declassifiers of historic documents should already be using this authority. In practice, however, they are not.

    Section 3.1 (d) states: “In some exceptional cases, however, the need to protect such information may be outweighed by the public interest in disclosure of the information, and in these cases the information should be declassified. When such questions arise, they shall be referred to the agency head or the senior agency official. That official will determine, as an exercise of discretion, whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the damage to the national security that might reasonably be expected from disclosure.”

    This section has not been used nearly enough for the declassification of historic documents. This lack of a “rational declassification process” has led to many embarrassing classification decisions (such as the continued classification of the History-101 fact that there were Jupiter missiles in Turkey during the Cuban Missile Crisis).

    The National Declassification Center’s disappointingly low 61% declassification rate of historic (25 years or older) documents is an embarrassing indicator of over-classification and under-reliance of the “public interest declassification clause” at NARA itself.

    This extreme over-classification of historic records undermines the public’s trust in the system as a whole, and inhibits the public release of historically important information that does not require further protection to researchers.

    NARA’s Open Government Plan can remedy this problem by establishing a procedure so that declassifiers at NARA, including the National Declassification Center, can easily request that EO 13526 section 3.1 (d) be used to declassify technically “properly” classified information that is in the public interest and no longer needs protection.

    This will instill a spirit of openness, establish NARA as a declassification leader, and guarantee that the Director of National Intelligence General Counsel’s instruction to ask “not can we classify but should we” is followed.

    Below are several more minor suggestions and one criticism of the NARA Open Government Plan from an Open Government advocate focused on improving the declassification of historic documents:

    Going a step further than my previous suggestion. The Information and Security Oversight Office should formalize the DNI and his general counsel’s instructions on “public interest declassification” in all of its classification and declassification trainings and assessments of agencies government-wide.

    The Plan’s Crowdsourcing Tool Initiative should specifically mention and include documents declassified by the National Declassification Center.

    The Plan’s Online Catalog Initiative should specifically mention publishing as much information online as possible (box level?) about the documents and collections declassified (and denied) by the National Declassification Center, even if those documents have not fully completed the NARA indexing process.

    Again, the Plan’s digitization, citizen archivist, and wikipedia efforts should specifically mention the documents declassified by the National Declassification Center.

    If implemented, the modernization of records initiative, especially the systematized capture of emails, will be a terrific success.

    In its outreach and online content initiative NARA should again specifically mention records declassified by the National Declassification Center.

    And the criticism: NARA should consider modifying or scrapping its Referral Notification Tracking System. Referrals are the largest problem contributing to the years and decades-old age of many FOIA requests, so NARA should be lauded in its attempts to tackle the problem. However, NARA should be working to minimize or end the extremely inefficient referral (and consultation) process, rather than use resources to build another system that will further memorialize it. Better solutions to fixing the referral black hole include working with agencies to complete non-referral agreements (some currently exist) so that a document can be reviewed by one set of eyes, rather than fourteen. Another, even better, solution would be to embrace the President’s memorandum establishing the National Declassification Center that stated referral review of historic documents that do not contain WMD or sources and methods was no longer required. Any referral reform that does not end or minimize the process of multiple re-reviews of the same document is not likely to lead to true referral improvement.

    The National Archives is America’s largest repository of classified documents, and is also the institution best situated to force the enactment of President Obama’s Open Government classification reforms –described in both Open Government Partnership National Action Plans, his Executive order on Classification, and his Memo establishing procedures at the National Declassification Center.

    NARA is also home to the Sunlight-promoting Office of Government Information Services, Information Security Oversight Office, and Interagency Security Classification Appeals panel –which overrules agency classification decisions in over 68 percent of its cases.

    As an organization with such power and tools to enact transformative classification reform, it was disappointing to see such tepid declassification initiates in NARA’s Open Government Plan.

    Fortunately, NARA has embraced the Sunshine and welcomed comments and suggestions on how it can improve its Open Government initiatives. I hope it will heed the advice of others and myself and realize that the US National Archives has a major role to embrace in improving the declassificiaton system in America.

  4. I assume that you are also considering public comments posted to the National Declassification Center blog. If not, please look at them as there are numerous comments requesting declassification of remaining classified files related to the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963. These records are perhaps the most sought after at the Archives, and we are hoping that the Archives can advance the historicial record by processing these records for declassification.

  5. I will be sure to read D.N.I. General Counsel Litt’s speech which Nate Jones (National Security Archive) praises, but if our only hope in shedding light on vast numbers of 50-yr, 75-yr and even older historical documents is E.O. 13522, then we should not hold our breath. What does President Obama’s order say? It merely advises that in “exceptional cases” agency heads or senior officials (and I suppose this is way up high on their priority list) will determine if maybe certain documents can be released that are not sensitive now in the first place to justify their being withheld from the public. History shows that the only way to pry information from those in power that do not want the people to know their government’s history, is to pass laws – put the power of the legislature to work – in order to compel agencies to give up their secrets. Witness the human rights abuses in Guatemala; the Kennedy Assassination Records; Vietnam POW files etc etc. Executive Orders such as 13526 are drafted by administrations largely in order to protect the Executive Branch from public scrutiny, thereby concealing the records that the American people pay for through taxation. If you want real reform, you need to champion those in Congress who will put the law to work for true open government, and to push the rest to do the same. Timid approaches and pleading and hoping are poor substitutes for advocacy and lobbying.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *